Case Summary Citation
FMC Corp. v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, 942 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2019)
In 1998, FMC Corporation agreed to submit to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ permitting processes, including the payment of fees, for clean-up work required as part of consent decree negotiations with the Environmental Protection Agency. Then, in 2002, FMC refused to pay the Tribes under a permitting agreement entered into by both parties, even though the company continued to store hazardous waste on land within the Shoshone-Bannock Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho. FMC challenged the Tribes’ authority to enforce the $1.5 million permitting fees first in tribal court and later challenged the Tribes’ authority to exercise civil regulatory and adjudicatory jurisdiction over the non-Indian corporation in federal court. FMC Corp. v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes demonstrates the complexities and fraught nature of tribal civil jurisdiction.
Administrative Law Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Common Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Courts Commons, Cultural Heritage Law Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Government Contracts Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Remedies Commons, Legal Writing and Research Commons, Litigation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Organizations Law Commons, President/Executive Department Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons, Water Law Commons