Under the two-prong test set forth in Rule 36(b), the mere inconvenience of a party’s failure to respond to requests for admission is not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant the denial of Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw or amend his admissions.
Bates v. Anderson, 2014 MT 7, --- Mont. ---, --- P.3d ---,
0 Mont. L. Rev.
Available at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/mlr/vol0/iss5/6